When you have to pass an anti-defection law, you are making a legal decision, and the decision is up to you to make. It’s not like the law says “you can’t have sex with animals.” It’s just that, if the law says that, you don’t have to go to the trouble of making that choice.
This is why a law that makes all sexual acts illegal has to be repealed and never enforced. If you don’t have sex with a non-human, that means you’re breaking the law. Its not like the law says you have to leave your apartment. Its just that, if the law says you cant have sex with anyone but your partner, then you have to leave.
It does say you cant have sex with anyone without a partner. But that doesn’t mean that people who don’t have a partner are not going to make the choice to have sex with someone else. Its not like the law says you cant have sex with someone you don’t love. Its just that, if the law says you cannot have sex with your partner, you are not going to have sex with your partner.
To leave your apartment, you need to get permission from your landlord. If you are not the person who does the renting, then you cannot be the person that gives the landlord permission to let you leave. So if you are not the person who has the landlord’s permission to leave (and you don’t), then you cannot be the person who returns to the apartment with your partner. So that means that you are now the person who is breaking the anti defection law.
We are not sure how the anti defection law works, but it is likely that the law has something to do with if you have sex with your partner and the landlord and everyone else knows that you are not the person who gives the landlord permission to let you leave.
the anti defection law seems to mean that if you and your partner are having sex it is not okay for you to return to the apartment with him. It is a bit odd to me that it would be an effective law, but it seems that it is a popular one.
I think it is unlikely that there would be an anti-defection law, but I think it is still possible that the law and the laws it leads to, are effective.
The anti-defection law seems to be a bit of a controversial one. I personally think that the law is silly and not effective at all. I think that there is a difference between “I don’t know what I’m going to do about this” and “I’m not going to do anything about this.
You do not know what you are going to do. You DO know what you are NOT going to do. It’s that simple. There is no law that says you can’t do something if you don’t know what you are.
This is why I think the anti-defection law is silly. It means that you can do something regardless of what the law says you can do. You can do the same things as before and still be good, but you wont be. The law is just a guideline. You can run, jump, hide, scream, get a gun, whatever you want, but the law WILL force you to do what the law says you are not allowed to do.