The only way I know how to explain this is that omission is the opposite of consent.
A lot of us are guilty of this one. When we don’t tell someone something, it either feels as if it is a withholding of something, or as if we are saying something that is against our character, and thus it is against us. In the case of sex, this might be what we are saying, and the person we are with is telling us that they are uncomfortable with us being intimate with them.
In addition to being a common term in the legal lexicon, omission is also a common phrase used in the media and online. There is a lot of coverage of the case of an 18-year-old woman in Maryland who was sentenced to prison for life for her part in a sex trafficking ring.
I don’t know of any cases where an omission is a sentence, but there is a lot of coverage of people being sentenced for the same offense. For example, there were a lot of articles about a man in New York who was sentenced to life for the rape and murder of a teen girl. These kinds of crimes are often considered to be less serious than the murder of a human being because the victim is typically considered to be of lesser value in the eyes of the law.
These people tend to be the ones who are the most committed to the trafficking ring, not the ones who are the most threatened. Since they are the “victims” of the ring, they are the ones who commit a violent crime. The truth is, the people who commit such crimes tend to be those who are most likely to have the most active and aggressive life-cycle of any victim.
I don’t think that law enforcement should be so focused on protecting the human beings who are the victims of a violent crime, but rather the ones who are the most likely to commit these crimes. We as humans have a tendency to dehumanize other human beings, and thus it is our job to protect the lives of those we deem as less valuable than us. However, the people who are the most likely to commit violence are those who are least likely to be able to defend themselves.
It’s no longer a problem that people are killed by the police. What is a problem is that many of the people who are left to defend themselves are the most vulnerable and least able to defend themselves. As a result, the people who are left to defend themselves are the most likely to commit violence (whether because of the police or by themselves).
These are just a few of the real world examples where law enforcement is in the wrong, but the solution is not to put people in jail. In fact, we need to ensure that our police force is better equipped to deal with and prevent crime.
This is one of the issues that Law Enforcement has when it comes to dealing with the “omissions” that often occur. Many crimes can be prevented if the government (or at least the police) were better equipped to deal with those crimes.
We could talk about the fact that we all know what is an omission and what isn’t, but what about the little things that are omitted? What about the fact that police departments aren’t even equipped to deal with some of these omissions? Sure, they can be fixed, but that only makes things worse.
